Sol-Attn quality comparison — MiniMax H3, 362 frames

Same seed, same prompt, same 20 steps at 1344×768. Only the attention configuration differs, so every visible difference between these columns is the sparsity setting and nothing else. Click any frame to enlarge.

What to look for. Block-sparse routing fails on fast motion, fine repeated detail and hard edges — so check the spokes in shot 2, the railings and scattering pigeons in shot 3, and rain streaks on the lens in shot 4. The two amber columns are flagged because their audio track already deviates most from the baseline (+1.2 and +1.6 dB mean); timing alone would have picked them as the winners.

sage only1.00x991.0 saudio —baseline
+ sol int81.39x714.9 saudio -0.5tau 1.2, window .2-.9
+ tau 1.61.53x648.2 saudio +0.2~6% blocks exact
+ window .1-.951.56x635.5 saudio +1.2tau 1.2, wider sigma span
+ tau 2.01.64x602.9 saudio +1.6~2.7% blocks exact

t = 2s Shot 1 — courier at the crosswalk, tracking right

sage only at 2s
sage only
+ sol int8 at 2s
+ sol int8
+ tau 1.6 at 2s
+ tau 1.6
+ window .1-.95 at 2s
+ window .1-.95
+ tau 2.0 at 2s
+ tau 2.0

t = 6s Shot 2 — low tracking on the spinning wheel

sage only at 6s
sage only
+ sol int8 at 6s
+ sol int8
+ tau 1.6 at 6s
+ tau 1.6
+ window .1-.95 at 6s
+ window .1-.95
+ tau 2.0 at 6s
+ tau 2.0

t = 9.5s Shot 3 — whip pan to wide, pigeons scattering

sage only at 9.5s
sage only
+ sol int8 at 9.5s
+ sol int8
+ tau 1.6 at 9.5s
+ tau 1.6
+ window .1-.95 at 9.5s
+ window .1-.95
+ tau 2.0 at 9.5s
+ tau 2.0

t = 13s Shot 4 — close on face, rain on the lens

sage only at 13s
sage only
+ sol int8 at 13s
+ sol int8
+ tau 1.6 at 13s
+ tau 1.6
+ window .1-.95 at 13s
+ window .1-.95
+ tau 2.0 at 13s
+ tau 2.0